So I just found out

"spanfucker retire bitch" (lelykon) 03/02/2016 at 13:26 • Filed to: None

2

25

That the 2017 Ford Fusion Configurator is live. With all of the prices as well. Want to know what the Fusion Sport base price is? It’s $33,475. !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!

dogisbadob > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:34

2

Too bad no more manual transmission, and no Fusion ST, either.

Ford should kill off that stupid 2.5L and replace it with the 2.0 from the Focus. Nice to see a small V6 , but transverse V6's do suck.

For Sweden > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:34

3

NP

Eric @ opposite-lock.com > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 13:39

0

Seriously. If you’re going to go transverse, you really need to go inline. If you are longitudinal, you have the choice of the two for packaging.

Sweet Trav > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:43

2

So depressing.

My SHO is now pointless.

RiceRocketeer Extraordinaire > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:46

0

nice.

64Mali > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:47

0

So, much, want....

The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 13:53

0

So it be about 15% more in Canada. That be around $39000.

spanfucker retire bitch > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 14:08

1

They already have the 2.0L as an option. Are you referring to the 1.6L?

V8Demon - Prefers Autos for drag racing. Fite me! > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:30

0

SE with 2.0 EcoBoost and a few other things.....$28,100

Snooder87 > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:32

0

Did they make the fusion ugly? Why? Why would they do this?

MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:34

1

Yeah that really doesn’t seem bad price wise.

I’ll take 1 in blue please.

dogisbadob > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:41

0

No. They only have the 2.0 *turbo* (ecoboost) as an option.

I’m referring to the 2.0 *non* turbo from the Focus. Use THAT as the base engine for the Fusion instead of the 2.5 NA they have now.

spanfucker retire bitch > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 14:44

1

Oh, I didn’t realize they had a 2.0 non-boost. I thought that was the role the 1.6EB took over.

Shows how closely I follow the Focus product lineup.

TylerJ > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:44

0

Well crap. You can’t get it without a light grey headliner.

dogisbadob > spanfucker retire bitch 03/02/2016 at 14:55

0

That’s because we really only care about the ST and RS on here ;)

But yeah, the 2.0 NA is still available on the Focus, along with a 1.0EB

Manwich - now Keto-Friendly > Snooder87 03/02/2016 at 15:22

1

Looks nice to me...

CALUSA > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 15:33

2

Ford is planning on making more fast versions of their cars, hopefully the Mondeo/ Fusion as well.

dogisbadob > CALUSA 03/02/2016 at 15:47

1

If Ford was still with Mazda, we’d have a MS6 and a Fusion ST!

Snooder87 > Manwich - now Keto-Friendly 03/02/2016 at 15:48

0

Look at that grill and tell me it isn’t objectively and substantially worse than the original.

For fucks sake, the car looked great from the front and all it needed was a bit of love from the back. but instead they keep the lame backside and fuck up the sweet grill.

CALUSA > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 15:57

2

Aren’t they anymore?

dogisbadob > CALUSA 03/02/2016 at 15:58

1

Nope, Mazda left a couple years ago.

CALUSA > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 16:01

2

Oh, you’re right! I do think that Ford is going to make a faster Fusion, but Mazda won’t make a MS6.... Shame.

Manwich - now Keto-Friendly > Snooder87 03/02/2016 at 18:16

1

I like that grill.

I wish to fornicate with it.

:-)

Sweet Trav > dogisbadob 03/02/2016 at 18:51

1

But why? It’s the same engine, both are just Mazda MZR motors with different displacements.

dogisbadob > Sweet Trav 03/02/2016 at 19:00

0

Only slightly less power, but better mpg, plus they’d only have to certify one engine instead of two.